On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 02:05:02PM -0700, Douglas, William wrote:
I'm mostly thinking as this is a generic use case bundle having
for nss and openssh seems to be correct. The other bits included are
the openssh tmpfiles and openssh's moduli file (which should probably
be moved into extras with the rest of openssh's server parts I think).
I do have an issue with this patch due to nss being a special
snowflake and nss-bin (and nss-lib) being the only installable
package. Do you want me to push that change or would you like to see a
This patch it's ok, I just wanted to know if we would be missing
something to validate to avoid regressions later about this fix.
please go ahead and push.
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Simental Magana, Marcos
> This looks correct to me, just a quick question; is there any
> particular use case for this change I'm missing here?
> If so, would be nice also to validate we're not missing some bits
> which are necessary today :-).
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 08:24:53PM +0000, William Douglas wrote:
>> For cryptograhy we aren't particuarly required to be extremely size
>> sensative so adding the base package for openssh and nss (giving users
>> docs and libraries for instance) seems to be the right move. Also sort
>> the package list.
>> bundles/cryptography | 10 +++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/bundles/cryptography b/bundles/cryptography
>> index 6fc823f..c9d38e0 100644
>> --- a/bundles/cryptography
>> +++ b/bundles/cryptography
>> @@ -3,12 +3,12 @@
>> # [STATUS]: Active
>> # [CAPABILITIES]:
>> # [MAINTAINER]: Marcos Simental <marcos.simental.magana(a)intel.com>
> Don't Panic!
> Marcos Simental.