Hello, I am currently running Ubuntu 18.04 off my 16GB Optane disk (of which only 14GB is being shown in the GNOME-Disks utility). I have done a full-desktop GNOME install (including Plymouth) and run Firefox as the only additional graphical application along with my required tools; binutils and Vim. All that this configuration takes up is 6GB of disk space. I had a discussion with someone from the core team at Intel (don't remember his name at all) and he mentioned that the reason I cannot install "Clear Linux OS Desktop" to my Optane disk is because there is some kind of 3 layer filter which prevents installation to targets less than 20GB to avoid dealing with problems and issues arising out of disk overuse. What I don't understand is, why should a sleek distribution like "Clear Linux OS" mandate that 20GB limit, even in it's desktop configuration, when even a blown-up distribution like Ubuntu does manage to happily install and work painlessly on my 16GB Optane while utilizing less than 50% of disk space. Can the core team not think about making the installation process more flexible by granting the end-user choice about what to install over-and-above the base system at first-install? For that matter, why does the installer need to even consider installing anything over-and-above the base system when the rest can be installed post first-boot? I believe someone mentioned that Intel is targeting the "Clear Linux OS Desktop" system towards kernel developers; aren't kernel developers capable enough of using "swupd" at the Terminal CLI or even working with the graphical Software Installation tool? Something seems to be terribly wrong in the way things are being thought-out regarding this distribution. Maybe there's confusion about the target audience, maybe something else, but one of the basic principles of "user interface design" mandate that users be granted choices as early and as often as possible. Do consider. ~Mayuresh