On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 09:08:11AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On 8/3/2017 8:57 AM, Simental Magana, Marcos wrote:
> flatpak verifies GPG signatures of apps, which makes flatpak to
> require gpg binaries to be available.
wouldn't it be nicer to have the flatpak rpm require: gpg ?
that would work
too. Yes would be nicer, I'm following that approach
instead of this one.
Please disregard this patch.