Great, thank you.
On Fri, May 20, 2016, 7:35 PM Victor Rodriguez <vm.rod25(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Done , will be in the next external release
Regards
Victor Rodriguez
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Abraham Arce <xe1gyq(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Great, thanks Jim, Victor.
On Mon, May 16, 2016, 6:41 PM Victor Rodriguez <vm.rod25(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Sure Jim
>
> I will sync with Avraham on this
>
> Thanks for the support
>
> Regards
>
> Victor Rodriguez
>
> On May 16, 2016 6:16 PM, "Chamings, James E"
<jim.chamings(a)intel.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> The overall goal of bundles is to provide a collective functional
>> capability. So really, the example of message-broker-rabbitmq is not
ideal
>> in this case; it was mostly included that
way as a part of the
openstack
>> deployment in ClearLinux and really
should have just been called
>> ‘message-broker’ or even ‘openstack-message-broker’.
>>
>>
>>
>> For this one, since mosquitto is relatively unique to iot, I would
prefer
>> to see it included in the ‘iot’ bundle
directly, as part of that
functional
>> technology. Your point about wanting to
run a server standalone is
>> well-taken, however, so may I suggest ‘iot-message-broker’ as a new
bundle,
>> that includes mosquitto/mqtt, and that is
then included as you have
>> suggested in ‘iot’.
>>
>>
>>
>> Having a generic bundle of message brokers would not be particularly
>> useful, since very very few people would ever want to have both
running
in
>> the same place.
>>
>>
>>
>> Summary:
>>
>> 1) New bundle: ‘iot-message-broker’, contents ‘mosquitto’.
>>
>> 2) Add ‘include(iot-message-broker)’ to ‘iot’ bundle.
>>
>>
>>
>> [ Victor, if there’s no issue with this layout, feel free to do it up
and
>> merge it… ]
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Jim Chamings
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Dev <dev-bounces(a)lists.clearlinux.org> on behalf of Abraham Arce
>> <xe1gyq(a)gmail.com>
>> Date: Monday, May 16, 2016 at 8:35 AM
>> To: Victor Rodriguez <vm.rod25(a)gmail.com>
>> Cc: "dev(a)lists.clearlinux.org" <dev(a)lists.clearlinux.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Dev] Bundle Mqtt Broker
>>
>>
>>
>> Arjan, Victor,
>>
>> Thanks for your quick response and comments...
>>
>>
>> First, the reason for my request is we are going to use Clear Linux as
a
>> Learning Platform for Cloud as part of
"The IoT Learning Initiative"
>>
https://theiotlearninginitiative.gitbooks.io/master/content/
>>
https://twitter.com/IoTLearningInit
>>
>> Second, by looking at the List of Bundles we have a couple which looks
>> related:
>>
>>
>> Bundle message-broker-rabbitmq
>>
>>
https://github.com/clearlinux/clr-bundles/blob/master/bundles/message-broke…
>>
>> Bundle iot
>>
https://github.com/clearlinux/clr-bundles/blob/master/bundles/iot
>>
>> I don't think neither iot bundle nor lamp-basic are the right place to
>> include Mosquitto Mqtt Broker, I might want only to have Clear Linux
server
>> work as a messaging broker alone. If we
want to follow a convention to
what
>> Victor Morales maintains with rabbitmq,
then we could probably call it
>> "message-broker-mosquitto"
>>
>>
>> They are part of "Messaging Protocols" / "Message Brokers" /
>> "Connectivity Protocol" and since IoT is having a big impact on them,
some
>> people called them "IoT
Protocols".
>> Should we start creating a bundle with some of the previous names to
>> group them? how about "message-brokers" since we are dealing with
specific
>> application and not the protocol and once
we have this new bundle we
can
>> make iot to
"include(message-brokers)" bundle?
>>
>> We can start with Mosquitto for now and add other protocols as required
>> in future, in summary the proposal is:
>>
>> message-broker-mosquitto New Bundle
>>
>> + mosquitto
>>
>>
>>
>> message-brokers New Bundle
>> + include(message-broker-mosquitto)
>> + include(message-broker-rabbitmq)
>>
>> iot Modified Bundle
>> ...
>> + include(message-brokers)
>>
>>
>>
>> Please let me know your comments...
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Abraham
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Victor Rodriguez <vm.rod25(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> As far as I can see mosquito provides a lightweight method of
>> carrying out messaging using a publish/subscribe model for the IoT
>> devices.
>>
>> So Clear Linux might have an IoT bundle; however, in my opinion, it
>> might not be the best place for it. We might need to put this in a
>> server bundle , like LAMP ( just saying one ) . But sure a bundle
>> from the server point of view with more protocols that the industry
>> uses to communicate IoT devices.
>>
>> Abraham , do you know if there is more of these protocols that might
>> be worth to include . Would be nice to have a bundle that supports the
>> most used IoT communication protocols.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Victor Rodriguez
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Arjan van de Ven <
arjan(a)linux.intel.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On 5/15/2016 10:37 PM, Abraham Arce wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Clear Linux Team,
>> >>
>> >> How possible is it you can integrate Mosquitto Mqtt Broker as part
of
>> >> a
>> >> bundle?
>> >> Thanks!
>> >>
>> >>
http://mosquitto.org/download/
>> >>
>> >
>> > since bundles are use/functionality based.... for us to know where to
>> > put
>> > it....
>> >
>> > How would you use this component ?
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Dev mailing list
>> >
Dev(a)lists.clearlinux.org
>> >
https://lists.clearlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>
>>