On 11/20/2015 1:19 PM, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:30 PM, SGhosh <sghosh(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Is there a different scope here from CoreOS is doing with the Go
> implementation in cloud-config ?
Hi,
I'd say no - everyone (including the reference implementation) is
clearly implementing along the same spec here - as it should be. We
want users to be able to provide the same cloud-config syntax to all
of their cloud nodes, no matter the VM OS. I do not think that this
project will turn into something that is radically different over
time, either.
...and before people ask.. "then why not use the CoreOS one";
we're looking at adding custom extensions in the future, and in addition,
for the super-tiny segment, GO tends to not be quite as nice due to
binary size.