"Douglas, William" <william.douglas(a)intel.com> writes:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 3:03 PM, Leandro Dorileo
> This bundle is intended to centralize tools, and development packages
> for graphics developers.
> Signed-off-by: Leandro Dorileo <leandro.maciel.dorileo(a)intel.com>
> auto.devbundles | 1 +
> bundles/os-graphics | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 bundles/os-graphics
> diff --git a/auto.devbundles b/auto.devbundles
> index 1f086f6..a46f7b1 100644
> --- a/auto.devbundles
> +++ b/auto.devbundles
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ network-basic
> diff --git a/bundles/os-graphics b/bundles/os-graphics
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8460c0e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/bundles/os-graphics
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +# [TITLE]: os-graphics
> +# [DESCRIPTION]: Contains graphics tools
Bundles are still intended to be functional in nature so what is it
somebody who installs this bundle would be able to do afterward?
This is intended to centralized graphics tools and development packages, think about
graphics developers and their need to have all their development packages - being it
libraries/headers, user space tools and whatnot.
> +# [STATUS]: Active
> +# [CAPABILITIES]:
> +# [MAINTAINER]: Leandro Dorileo <leandro.maciel.dorileo(a)intel.com>
May consider an include(libX11client).
Yep makes sense.
I wonder if the bundle should
be more developer focused and instead of having an autodev bundle, it
should just contain the expected -dev packages directly.
Can't say for sure right now. I'll spend a bit more time on it, maybe someone
speaks up about this. :)
> Dev mailing list