On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:43 AM <zvnexus(a)outlook.com> wrote:
How about aosp-dev?
In packaging we generally use the -dev suffix to indicate the
components that the package ships (headers and the like). In Clear we
(and by we, I mean me X( ) sort of made this more confusing due to our
-dev bundles being the content needed to build whatever the suffix is
attached to, so in that respect the name is fine. I'm a little anxious
about the use of a project name like aosp which itself may be
something with dev components. That said I think that's fine for now
(I'll pay the rename price in the future if I'm wrong) so in it goes.