Arjan wrote, 2016-12-25:
>> On 12/25/2016 8:58 AM, Sven wrote:
>>> Hello Arjan.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your answers.
>>>
>>> Arjan van de Ven <arjan(a)linux.intel.com> wrote, 2016-12-25 07:21:
>>>> On 12/25/2016 1:19 AM, SH wrote:
>>>>> Does Clear Linux support running binaries for the x32 ABI?
>>>>
>>>> currently we do not support this; we can certainly look into it,
>>>> the most complicated factor will be build infrastructure rather
>>>> than packaging.
>>>
>>> That's true if you want to allow compiling in x32 mode.
>>> It's easier for running x32 binaries (maybe produced on another
>>> system):
>>> this requires only that the kernel
>>> contains the given feature (CONFIG_X86_X32).
>>> For example, I regularly build my x32 binaries on Ubuntu (which has
>>> a x32 tool chain and libraries) and can run the (statically
>>> linked) x32 binary on openSUSE boxes (which have no x32 tool chain and
>>> no x32 libraries).
>>>
>>
>> well the flipside argument is one of security attack surface; adding a
>> whole
>> new surface for something we don't ship/use ourselves will give the
>> security
>> folks some shivers..... it's a bit of a balance as a result.
Is security concerns the reason why no one has built WINE and put it in
the repository?
Jeff