On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 04:55:17PM -0700, Douglas, William wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 4:43 PM Thiago Macieira
> <thiago.macieira(a)intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > The GNOME desktop already comes with gedit. Anyone who wants Emacs can
> > easily install it via swupd.
> >
> > Fixes clearlinux/distro#951.
> >
Using same logic, Should CL remove gvim too?
On 6/28/2019 4:55 PM, Douglas, William wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 4:43 PM Thiago Macieira
> <thiago.macieira(a)intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> The GNOME desktop already comes with gedit. Anyone who wants Emacs can
>> easily install it via swupd.
however emacs is much more developer focused than gedit
we really need the also-add feature to land urgently and this gets much simpler...
'plugin_dir' was renamed 'plugin_dirs' on upstream since it is a list.
This was causing our sed to miss. Therefore, that entry was left unchanged,
breaking the creation of containers that require plugins.
Signed-off-by: Murilo Belluzzo <murilo.belluzzo(a)intel.com>
---
0003-Update-default-crio.conf-file-for-Clear-Linux.patch | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/0003-Update-default-crio.conf-file-for-Clear-Linux.patch b/0003-Update-default-crio.conf-file-for-Clear-Linux.patch
index e2aafa9..80e6129 100644
--- a/0003-Update-default-crio.conf-file-for-Clear-Linux.patch
+++ b/0003-Update-default-crio.conf-file-for-Clear-Linux.patch
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ index df46b63..295588b 100644
+ sed -i "s|^#\(registries = \[\).*|\1\n\t'docker.io',\n\]|" crio.conf
+ sed -i 's|^\(signature_policy = \).*|\1"/usr/share/defaults/crio/policy.json"|' crio.conf
+ sed -i 's|^#\(storage_driver = \).*|\1"overlay"|' crio.conf
-+ sed -i 's|^\(plugin_dir = \[\).*|\1\n\t"/usr/libexec/cni",|' crio.conf
++ sed -i 's|^\(plugin_dirs = \[\).*|\1\n\t"/usr/libexec/cni",|' crio.conf
release-note:
@$(GOPATH)/bin/release-tool -n $(release)
--
2.21.0
I'm looking to add a new package libytnef. It is a dependency for geary,
which was requested in IRC.
It flows through autospec neatly.
make autospecnew URL="https://github.com/Yeraze/ytnef/archive/v1.9.3.tar.gz"
NAME="libytnef"
--
Puneet Sethi
So there is a new GTK3 only build now. It contains benchmarks as well, except one that is heavily dependent on GTK2.
This benchmark is kind of pointless in this context anyway, as it would compare apples and oranges (GTK2 vs GTK3/cairo libraries).
If anything, GPU test should probably use OpenGL. Anyway there are other display benchmarks available in CLR (glxgears, glmark2, ...)
Juro
________________________________________
From: Dev [dev-bounces(a)lists.clearlinux.org] on behalf of Bystricky, Juro [juro.bystricky(a)intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 3:28 PM
To: Kok, Auke-jan H; dev(a)lists.clearlinux.org
Subject: Re: [Clr-dev] [PATCH clr-bundles V2] hardinfo: Autospec creation for version 098e0c0955305ae60cf8b8892bcf34a957f5286c
I revisited/rebuilt the GTK3 version. Seems robust enough, HOWEVER the whole "Benchmark" section is missing.
I filed a bug, but I suspect this is done intentionally, as the section may not be GTK3 ready yet.
So there are two choices:
1. Complete build with GTK2
2. Build with GTK3 but without benchmarks.
There's pros/cons for both options. Myself, I don't have a hard preference. (I will monitor the
git repo for updates.)
Juro
________________________________________
From: Kok, Auke-jan H
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 12:47 PM
To: Bystricky, Juro; dev(a)lists.clearlinux.org
Subject: Re: [Clr-dev] [PATCH clr-bundles V2] hardinfo: Autospec creation for version 098e0c0955305ae60cf8b8892bcf34a957f5286c
You have:
On 6/25/19 12:19 PM, Juro Bystricky wrote:
> +BuildRequires : pkgconfig(gtk+-2.0)
> +BuildRequires : pkgconfig(gtk+-3.0)
But you then have:
> +++ b/used_libs
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +libX11.so.6
> +libc.so.6
> +libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
> +libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
> +libgio-2.0.so.0
> +libglib-2.0.so.0
> +libgmodule-2.0.so.0
> +libgobject-2.0.so.0
> +libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
Can we get the GTK3 version instead? We should really minimize the
amount of GTK2 apps we add at this point in time.
Auke
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev(a)lists.clearlinux.orghttps://lists.clearlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
